On November 3, 2010, the Snoring Center filed a lawsuit against several individuals and entities, including Snoring Solutions, in the Northern District of Texas (pdf copy of complaint available here). Snoring Center claims that is operates a “revolutionary medical practice” in Texas that treats snoring through a minimally invasive, office-based treatment. According to Snoring Center, defendants posed as investors and as a potential joint venture, to “inveigle their way into [the Snoring Center’s] confidence.” Defendants allegedly obtained access to Snoring Center’s trade secrets, financial records, and business strategies, which they then used to establish their own competing medical practice called the Center for Snoring Solutions.
Snoring Center asserts causes of action for, among other things, false advertising, common law fraud, and misappropriation of trade secrets.
Snoring Center is represented by Michael Hurst and Anthony Magee, both of Gruber Hurst Johansen & Hail LLP.
The case is pending before Judge Solis.