Monthly Archives: April 2020

Artic Cat (Part I and II): Lots To Know About Patent Marking

In 2017 and 2020, the Federal Circuit issued two Arctic Cat decisions (available here and here) that are important for any patent litigator (and patent owner) to understand. Both decisions deal with patent marking and thus patent damages. By law, … Continue reading

Posted in Federal Circuit Court of Appeals | Comments Off on Artic Cat (Part I and II): Lots To Know About Patent Marking

Should You Communicate With Your Opponent’s Employees Without Your Opposing Counsel’s Permission? Likely Not.

I know it’s technically allowed in some instances but I’ve never seen a situation where contacting your opponent’s employees directly (as opposed to, e.g., seeking their depositions) did any good. So I avoid it. The district court (S.D.N.Y.) recently issued … Continue reading

Posted in Non-N.D. Tex. Notable Decisions, Practice Tips, Sanctions | Comments Off on Should You Communicate With Your Opponent’s Employees Without Your Opposing Counsel’s Permission? Likely Not.

E-Mail From Court to Court Coordinator, Instead of Signed Written Order, Is Sufficient to Trigger “Waiver Through Delay”

Things in Texas state court are a bit different from federal court. Take the Fifth District Court of Appeals’ decision In re Yamaha Golf-Car Company (available here). In the case, the trial court e-mailed her court administrator stating that the … Continue reading

Posted in Non-N.D. Tex. Notable Decisions, Practice Tips | Comments Off on E-Mail From Court to Court Coordinator, Instead of Signed Written Order, Is Sufficient to Trigger “Waiver Through Delay”

No, You Can’t Join Your Own IPR

On March 18, 2020, the Federal Circuit issued its decision in Facebook, Inc. v. Windy City Innovations, LLC (available here). At issue was whether Facebook could join its own IPR after the 1-year bar date. The Federal Circuit held that … Continue reading

Posted in Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals | Comments Off on No, You Can’t Join Your Own IPR

Judge Godbey Stays Patent Case Pending IPR, Pre-IPR Institution

On January 23, 2020, Judge Godbey issued a decision in Uniloc 2017 LLC v. LG Electronics (available here). Nine months after Uniloc filed suit, LG filed a petition for inter partes review of the patent-in-suit. Although the PTAB had not … Continue reading

Posted in Judge Godbey (Chief Judge) | Comments Off on Judge Godbey Stays Patent Case Pending IPR, Pre-IPR Institution

Judge Kinkeade Denies Motion for Leave to Proceed Without Local Counsel

On February 6, 2020, Judge Kinkeade denied a motion for leave to proceed without local counsel (minute order available here). Judge Kinkeade required the defendant to designate local counsel within 14 days and further provided that both local counsel and … Continue reading

Posted in Judge Kinkeade | Comments Off on Judge Kinkeade Denies Motion for Leave to Proceed Without Local Counsel

Judge Pittman Dismisses Lawsuit Without Prejudice For Failure To Comply With Local Counsel Requirement

On March 11, 2020, Judge Pittman entered an order (available here) in McDermott v. Salem Media Group. The Court has previously required the plaintiff to comply with Local Rule 83.10 (requiring local counsel) within fourteen days from February 25, 2020. … Continue reading

Posted in Judge Pittman | Comments Off on Judge Pittman Dismisses Lawsuit Without Prejudice For Failure To Comply With Local Counsel Requirement

Federal Circuit Finds That Retroactive Application Of IPR Proceedings To Pre-America Invents Act Patents Does Not Constitute An Unconstitutional Taking Under The Fifth Amendment

On July 30, 2019, the Federal Circuit issued its decision in Celgene Corp. v. Peter (available here). The Federal Circuit held that the retroactive application of inter partes review proceedings to pre-America Invents Act patents did not constitute an unconstitutional … Continue reading

Posted in Federal Circuit Court of Appeals | Comments Off on Federal Circuit Finds That Retroactive Application Of IPR Proceedings To Pre-America Invents Act Patents Does Not Constitute An Unconstitutional Taking Under The Fifth Amendment

Supreme Court Rules That States Cannot Be Sued For Copyright Infringement

On March 23, 2020, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Allen v. Cooper (available here). At issue was Congress’ attempt to strip the States of their sovereign immunity for copyright infringement. In 1999, the Supreme Court struck down Congress’ … Continue reading

Posted in U.S. Supreme Court | Comments Off on Supreme Court Rules That States Cannot Be Sued For Copyright Infringement

Amendment to Local Rules

Effective September 3, 2019, the Local Rules were amended (see Special Order No. 2-89, available here). The Court repealed L.R. 5.1 (specifying that the delivery of the notice of electronic filing constitutes service on each party who is a registered … Continue reading

Posted in Local Rules | Comments Off on Amendment to Local Rules