Monthly Archives: June 2019

Supreme Court Holds That IPRs Are Not Available To The Government

On June 10, 2019, the Supreme Court issued its 6-3 decision in Return Mail, Inc. v. United States Postal Service (decision available here). The American Invents Act of 2011 created the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, and allowed three new … Continue reading

Posted in U.S. Supreme Court | Comments Off on Supreme Court Holds That IPRs Are Not Available To The Government

Federal Circuit Finds That States’ Patents Are Subject To IPRs, Rejecting Sovereign Immunity Defense

On June 14, 2019, the Federal Circuit issued its decision in Regents of the University of Minnesota v. LSI Corp. (available here). The Federal Circuit found that “state sovereign immunity does not apply to” inter partes review proceedings, as the … Continue reading

Posted in Federal Circuit Court of Appeals | Comments Off on Federal Circuit Finds That States’ Patents Are Subject To IPRs, Rejecting Sovereign Immunity Defense

Another Decision Holding That Section 285 Attorney’s Fees Are Not Available From A Party’s Counsel (And Also Finding That Folks Don’t Go To Jail For Failing To Pay Debts)

The Eastern District of Texas’ Magistrate Judge Payne, on June 5, 2019, issued a decision in My Health, Inc. v. ALR Technologies, Inc. (available here), finding that 35 U.S.C. § 285 does not allow an award of attorney’s fees against … Continue reading

Posted in Developing Law | Comments Off on Another Decision Holding That Section 285 Attorney’s Fees Are Not Available From A Party’s Counsel (And Also Finding That Folks Don’t Go To Jail For Failing To Pay Debts)

Federal Circuit to RPX: “In IPR, You Only Get One Shot”

As Eminem once said, “You only get one shot, do not miss your chance to blow / This opportunity comes once in a lifetime.” On January 17, 2018, the Federal Circuit similarly told RPX in RPX Corp. v. Chanbond (available … Continue reading

Posted in Federal Circuit Court of Appeals | Comments Off on Federal Circuit to RPX: “In IPR, You Only Get One Shot”

Judge Posner Gets It Wrong On Patents: A Patent Doesn’t Give Anyone The Right To Practice The Invention

I had lunch the other day with an attorney who said that, when he was in law school, ol’ Learned Hand was the judge whose cases you were most often likely to read. I remember only one of Hand’s cases, … Continue reading

Posted in Federal Circuit Court of Appeals, Injunctions | Comments Off on Judge Posner Gets It Wrong On Patents: A Patent Doesn’t Give Anyone The Right To Practice The Invention

Section 285 Of Patent Act Cannot Be Used To Obtain Attorney’s Fees From Opposing Counsel

So holds the district court (C.D. Cal.) in Cap Export v. Zinus (available here). As I previously noted, courts have used Section 285 of the Patent Act—which provides that “[t]he court in exceptional cases may award reasonable attorney fees to … Continue reading

Posted in Attorney's Fees, Developing Law | Comments Off on Section 285 Of Patent Act Cannot Be Used To Obtain Attorney’s Fees From Opposing Counsel

What Business Does the Seventh Circuit Have Opining On Patent Law?

The other day, I came across the Seventh Circuit’s decision in ABS Global v. Genus PLC (available here) and nearly fell out of my chair. While I knew a non-Federal Circuit appellate court could have jurisdiction over a case involving … Continue reading

Posted in Federal Circuit Court of Appeals | Comments Off on What Business Does the Seventh Circuit Have Opining On Patent Law?

Another Spectacular Redaction Fail

As reported previously (see, e.g., here, here, here, and here), Paul Manafort’s lawyers did a bad job redacting a pleading in his criminal case. The pleading is available here. Starting on page 5 are numerous redactions. If you highlight the … Continue reading

Posted in Practice Tips | Comments Off on Another Spectacular Redaction Fail