Judge Means Denies Motions to Dismiss in American Airlines’ Antitrust Case Against Online Travel / Distribution Companies

On August 7, 2012, Judge Means of the Northern District of Texas denied Sabre, Travelport, and Orbitz’s (“defendants”) motions to dismiss American Airlines’ complaint. (Opinion available here (it was recently unsealed).) In the case, American Airlines claims that Sabre and Travelport unlawfully wield monopoly power in the market for the distribution of airlines fare, flight, and availability information and the provision of booking services to travel agents. “In addition, American allege[s] that Sabre and Travelport, along with Orbitz and other unnamed industry participants, had engaged in an industry-wide conspiracy to preserve the[ir] monopoly power.” Furthermore, “[a]ccording to American, the defendants have conspired to preserve [their preferred] model and to exclude American’s ‘AA Direct Connect’ from the [m]arket and submarkets. AA Direct Connect is a method of providing airline information and booking services directly to travel agents without having to go through [the defendants].”

Judge Means found, among other things, that American stated a plausible conspiracy-to-monopolize claim, adequately plead the existence of a conspiracy, and alleged facts sufficient to support a reasonable inference that Sabre and Travelport have been working together to exclude AA Direct Connect from the market and submarkets. Accordingly, Judge Means denied defendants’ motions to dismiss.    

American Airlines is represented by Paul Yetter, George Fibbe, Anna Rotman, of Yetter Coleman LLP; Allen Blaustein, Christopher Pace, Eric Hochstadt, James Quinn, Marc Weinroth, Michelle Hartmann, Richard Rothman, Robert Berezin, and Yolanda Garcia, all of Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP; Bill Bogle and Roland Johnson, both of Harris Finley & Bogle; Grace Kwon and Marc Schildkraut, both of Cooley LLP; and MJ Moltenbrey and Robert Zuver, Jr., both of Paul Hastings.  

Travelport is represented by John Schriver and Paul Chronis, both of Duane Morris LLP; and Michael Cowie, Carolyn Feeney, Craig Falls, Justin Pentz, and Michael Weiner, all of Dechert LLP; Christian Tucker and Walker Friedman, all of Friedman Suder & Cooke; and Faith GayKarin Kramer, Patrick Doolittle, and Steig Olson, all of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP.

Orbitz is represented by Christopher Yates, Brendan McShane, and Daniel Wall, all of Latham & Watkins LLP; John Little, of Little Pedersen Fankhauser LLP; and Megan Dredla and Stephen Gleboff, both of Gleboff Law Group PLLC.

Sabre is represented by Scott Fredricks and Philip Vickers, both of Cantey Hanger LLP; Andrew MacNally, Andrew Polovin, Chris Lind, Donald Scott, Karma Giulianelli, Katherine Swift, Sean Grimsley, and Sundeep Addy, all of Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar & Scott LLP; and George Cary, Kenneth Reinker, Larry Work-Dembowski, and Steven Kaiser, all of Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP.

Posted in Judge Means | Comments Off on Judge Means Denies Motions to Dismiss in American Airlines’ Antitrust Case Against Online Travel / Distribution Companies

BMI/Sony Sue Wild West Lubbock For Copyright Infringement

On August 23, 2012, BMI and Sony (as well as other related plaintiffs) filed a lawsuit (available here) in the Northern District of Texas alleging that Wild West Lubbock committed willful acts of copyright infringement due to its “unauthorized public performance of musical compositions from the BMI repertoire.” Plaintiffs seek an injunction, statutory damages, attorney’s fees and costs with their lawsuit.

Judge Cummings has been assigned the case.

Plaintiffs are represented by Ann Haag, of McCleskey Harriger Brazill & Graf LLP.

Posted in Judge Cummings (Ret.), New Lawsuits Filed | Comments Off on BMI/Sony Sue Wild West Lubbock For Copyright Infringement

Fossil Sues The Jones Group For Copyright Infringement Infringement

On August 22, 2012, Fossil filed a lawsuit (available here) against The Jones Group in the Northern District of Texas. Fossil claims that The Jones Group, which markets its products under the NINE WEST brand, “slavish[ly] copie[d]” Fossil’s jewelry line. Fossil, according to the complaint, has filed 35 copyright applications covering its jewelry designs, and has accordingly lodged claims for copyright infringement against The Jones Group.

The case has been assigned to Judge Lindsay.

Fossil is represented by Elizann Carroll and Molly Richard, both of Richard Law Group.

Posted in Judge Lindsay, New Lawsuits Filed | Comments Off on Fossil Sues The Jones Group For Copyright Infringement Infringement

Magistrate Judge Kaplan’s Farewell Reception To Be Held on September 19, 2012

The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas is holding a Farewell Reception honoring Magistrate Judge Kaplan for his eighteen years of service.

The reception is being hosted by the Federal Bar Association, Dallas Chapter, and will occur on Wednesday, September 19, 2012 at 5:00 at the Belo Mansion (invitation attached here).

Posted in Dallas Legal Community, Magistrate Judge Kaplan (Ret.) | Comments Off on Magistrate Judge Kaplan’s Farewell Reception To Be Held on September 19, 2012

What Do I Do If My Electronic Document Is Too Large To File?

Follow the Court’s procedure for filing large documents and adding attachments.

Posted in FAQs | Comments Off on What Do I Do If My Electronic Document Is Too Large To File?

What Happens If I Need To File a Non-Documentary or Oversized Object?

Per ECF Administrative Procedures Manual, § III (D): “If you are unable to electronically file a non-documentary or oversized object because of its physical size or character, submit it to the clerk’s office for filing. The clerk will docket a text-only event, generating a Notice of Electronic Filing, that describes the non-documentary or oversized object filed.”

Posted in FAQs | Comments Off on What Happens If I Need To File a Non-Documentary or Oversized Object?

If I’m Granted Leave to File a Document, and I Already Attached The Document As An Exhibit to a Motion, Must I File It Again?

Maybe. “If you are granted leave to file a document that is available in the Court’s record
(e.g., attached as an exhibit to your motion for leave to file), the clerk will file the
document as of the date of the order granting leave. If the document is not
available in the court’s record because you have not submitted it yet, you must
electronically file the document upon receipt of the order granting leave.” ECF Administrative Procedures Manual, § III(C).

Posted in FAQs | Comments Off on If I’m Granted Leave to File a Document, and I Already Attached The Document As An Exhibit to a Motion, Must I File It Again?

What If There’s an Emergency and I Can’t File a Document Electronically Because My Computer System is Down?

The Northern District of Texas has a procedure to follow, which is available here.

Posted in FAQs | Comments Off on What If There’s an Emergency and I Can’t File a Document Electronically Because My Computer System is Down?

How Do I Submit a Proposed Order to the Court?

Per ECF Administrative Procedures Manual, § II(F):  “To satisfy the requirement of LR 7.1(c) or LCrR 47.1(c), you must use the ‘Proposed Orders’ event and submit the proposed order in a word-processing format (e.g., Word or WordPerfect, not PDF). To serve a copy, you may attach a PDF version as an exhibit to the motion, but this does not satisfy the requirement to submit a proposed order to the judge.” A screen shot, as of August 15, 2012, of the instructions for submitting a proposed order is found here.

Posted in FAQs | Comments Off on How Do I Submit a Proposed Order to the Court?

What Do I Do If I Forget to Electronically Sign My Pleading, Motion, or Other Paper?

You can correct the deficiency by filing a Notice of Correction of Signature Omission, which is available here.

Posted in FAQs | Comments Off on What Do I Do If I Forget to Electronically Sign My Pleading, Motion, or Other Paper?