Subscribe to ND Tex Blog
-
Recent Posts
- CCRG’s First Texas Business Court Case
- Does Fed. R. Civ. P. 11 Require Attorneys To Interrogate Declarants On Whether They Used AI To Draft Their Declarations?
- On Improper Redactions
- Patent Pilot Program To Expire In July 2021
- Repeat Copyright Plaintiff (Who Is Also Attorney Who Represents Himself) Hit With $172,173 Award For Losing Copyright Case
Archives
- January 2025
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- September 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
Categories
- Attorney's Fees
- Costs
- Dallas Legal Community
- Developing Law
- Discovery
- Dondi
- Ethics
- FAQs
- Federal Circuit Court of Appeals
- Federal Rules
- Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals
- Injunctions
- Judge Boyle
- Judge Brown
- Judge Cummings (Ret.)
- Judge Fish
- Judge Fitzwater
- Judge Furgeson (Ret.)
- Judge Godbey (Chief Judge)
- Judge Hendrix
- Judge Kacsmaryk
- Judge Kinkeade
- Judge Lindsay
- Judge Lynn
- Judge Maloney (Ret.)
- Judge McBryde (Ret.)
- Judge Means
- Judge O'Connor
- Judge Pittman
- Judge Robinson (Ret.)
- Judge Scholer
- Judge Solis (Ret.)
- Judge Starr
- Local Rules
- Magistrate Judge Averitte (Ret.)
- Magistrate Judge Bryant
- Magistrate Judge Cureton
- Magistrate Judge Frost
- Magistrate Judge Horan
- Magistrate Judge Kaplan (Ret.)
- Magistrate Judge Koenig (Ret.)
- Magistrate Judge Lane (Ret.)
- Magistrate Judge Parker
- Magistrate Judge Ramirez
- Magistrate Judge Ray
- Magistrate Judge Reno
- Magistrate Judge Roach (Ret.)
- Magistrate Judge Rutherford
- Magistrate Judge Stickney (Ret.)
- Magistrate Judge Toliver
- N.D. Tex. News
- N.D. Tex. Patent Rules
- New Lawsuits Filed
- Non-N.D. Tex. Notable Decisions
- Northern District Practice Tips
- Personal
- Practice Tips
- Sanctions
- Texas Supreme Court
- U.S. Supreme Court
Author Archives: Steven Callahan
Samsung’s Motion for Summary Judgment Ruled On By Judge O’Connor In Sumimit 6 Case
On February 6, 2013, Judge O’Connor issued an Order (available here) in Summit 6 v. Samsung. Judge O’Connor ruled that Samsung’s motion for summary judgment of non-infringement should be denied in part, as there was sufficient evidence to raise a … Continue reading
Posted in Judge O'Connor
Comments Off on Samsung’s Motion for Summary Judgment Ruled On By Judge O’Connor In Sumimit 6 Case
Supreme Court Rules Legal Malpractice Cases Involving Patent Cases Belong In State Court
On February 20, 2013, the Supreme Court issued its decision (available here) in Gunn v. Minton. The long and the short of the decision is that legal malpractice cases involving allegations that attorneys botched patent infringement proceedings will have to … Continue reading
Posted in Developing Law, Non-N.D. Tex. Notable Decisions
Comments Off on Supreme Court Rules Legal Malpractice Cases Involving Patent Cases Belong In State Court
Judge Kinkeade Refuses to Disqualify Vinson & Elkins in Galderma Patent Infringement Lawsuit
On February 21, 2013, Judge Kinkeade issued an Order (available here) denying Galderma’s motion to disqualify Vinson & Elkins in a patent infringement lawsuit pending in the Northern District of Texas. Galderma retained V&E in 2003. V&E sent Galderma an … Continue reading
Posted in Judge Kinkeade
Comments Off on Judge Kinkeade Refuses to Disqualify Vinson & Elkins in Galderma Patent Infringement Lawsuit
Judge Solis Denies Motion to Enjoin and Motion to Dismiss in Excentus Patent In-fringement Lawsuit
On February 5, 2013, Judge Solis issued an Order (available here) in Excentus v. CodePro, a patent infringement lawsuit pending in the Northern District of Texas. Plaintiff (who had filed a declaratory judgment lawsuit against the Defendant after receiving a … Continue reading
Posted in Judge Solis (Ret.)
Comments Off on Judge Solis Denies Motion to Enjoin and Motion to Dismiss in Excentus Patent In-fringement Lawsuit
Parallel Networks Files Petition And Motion To Vacate Arbitration Award Against Jenner & Block In Dallas County
On January 29, 2013, Parallel Networks (a company that has filed a lot of patent infringement lawsuits) filed its Petition and Motion to Vacate Arbitration Award (available here) in Dallas County. In essence, Parallel Networks claims that an arbitrator exceeded … Continue reading
Posted in Dallas Legal Community
Comments Off on Parallel Networks Files Petition And Motion To Vacate Arbitration Award Against Jenner & Block In Dallas County
Cassidian Hits GN-911 With Patent Infringement Lawsuit
On February 8, 2013, Cassidian launched its patent infringement lawsuit (complaint available here) against NG-911 in the Northern District of Texas. Cassidian claims that NG-911’s emergency communications systems infringe Cassidian’s U.S. Patent No. 6,774,858. Cassidian is represented by Brett Govett … Continue reading
Posted in New Lawsuits Filed
Comments Off on Cassidian Hits GN-911 With Patent Infringement Lawsuit
Federal Inmates Pleads Guilty to Threatening Judge Cummings
On January 31, 2013, a federal inmate pled guilty to mailing a threatening communication to Judge Cummings, which expressed unhappiness with the inmate’s incarceration. The inmate faces a 10 year jail sentence and a $250,000 fine. More details are available … Continue reading
Posted in Judge Cummings (Ret.), N.D. Tex. News
Comments Off on Federal Inmates Pleads Guilty to Threatening Judge Cummings
Judge Ferguson Rules On Motions In Limine In Patent Infringement Case
On January 25, 2013, Judge Ferguson issued an Order (available here) in Axcess International v. Savi Technologies that resolved various motions in limine. Key rulings from Judge Ferguson’s Order are as follows: Presumption of Validity. “The Court is of the … Continue reading
Posted in Judge Furgeson (Ret.)
Comments Off on Judge Ferguson Rules On Motions In Limine In Patent Infringement Case
Federal Circuit Issues In Re EMC Corp. Mandamus Decision, Offering Substantial Guidance To Judges And Patent Practitioners In The Northern District of Texas On Transfer Issues
On January 29, 2013, the Federal Circuit issued its mandamus decision in In re EMC Corp. (available here). This decision, which applies in all patent infringement cases filed within the Fifth Circuit, such as in the Northern District of Texas, … Continue reading
Posted in Federal Circuit Court of Appeals, Non-N.D. Tex. Notable Decisions
Comments Off on Federal Circuit Issues In Re EMC Corp. Mandamus Decision, Offering Substantial Guidance To Judges And Patent Practitioners In The Northern District of Texas On Transfer Issues
Wireless Handover OY Hits AT&T With A Patent Infringement Lawsuit
On January 31, 2013, Wireless Handover filed its lawsuit (complaint available here) against AT&T in the Northern District of Texas. Wireless Handover asserts that AT&T infringes United States Patent No. 7,953,407, which claims technology relating to centralized management of telecommunications parameters. … Continue reading
Posted in New Lawsuits Filed
Comments Off on Wireless Handover OY Hits AT&T With A Patent Infringement Lawsuit