Author Archives: Steven Callahan

Supreme Court’s Medtronic v. Mirowski Decision

On January 22, 2014, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Medtronic v. Mirowski Family Ventures (decision available here). The Supreme Court held that, where a licensee asserts a declaratory judgment claim against a patent holder, it is the patent holder’s … Continue reading

Posted in Developing Law | Comments Off on Supreme Court’s Medtronic v. Mirowski Decision

New Trademark Infringement Cases Filed In Northern District of Texas

There have been many new trademark infringement lawsuits filed in the Northern District of Texas over the last several weeks, including: Gateway Buick v. Behlmann Automotive Services. (Complaint available here). Gearbox Software v. Apogee Software. (Complaint available here). Heinz v. … Continue reading

Posted in New Lawsuits Filed | Comments Off on New Trademark Infringement Cases Filed In Northern District of Texas

New Patent Cases Filed in the Northern District of Texas

Over the last several weeks, there have been many new patent infringement cases filed in the Northern District of Texas, including: Richmond v. Forever Gifts. The patent in suit claims technology relating to solar-powered garden lighting. (Complaint available here). J.W. … Continue reading

Posted in New Lawsuits Filed | Comments Off on New Patent Cases Filed in the Northern District of Texas

“The Effective Use of Electronic Media In the Courtroom” Presentation to Occur on February 27

The Federal Bar Association, Dallas Chapter is inviting attorneys to attend a presentation by Kathleen J. Love on “The Effective Use of Electronic Media in the Courtroom.” The presentation will occur on Thursday, February 27, 2014 (from 12:00-1:00 p.m. on … Continue reading

Posted in Dallas Legal Community | Comments Off on “The Effective Use of Electronic Media In the Courtroom” Presentation to Occur on February 27

Federal Circuit Issues Long Awaited Lighting Ballast Decision

On February 21, 2014, the Federal Circuit issued its en banc decision in Lighting Ballast v. Phillip Electronics (decision available here). The case had been appealed from Judge O’Connor’s earlier decision, and the Federal Circuit sat en banc to determine … Continue reading

Posted in Federal Circuit Court of Appeals, Judge O'Connor | Comments Off on Federal Circuit Issues Long Awaited Lighting Ballast Decision

Northern District of Texas’ Federal Civil Practice Seminar To Occur on January 16

The Federal Bar Association, Dallas Chapter, is hosting its annual Federal Civil Practice Seminar on Thursday, January 16, 2014 at 8:00 a.m. at the Belo Mansion. This will be a great program, with speakers including Judges Ferguson, Boyle, O’Connor, Cureton, … Continue reading

Posted in Practice Tips | Comments Off on Northern District of Texas’ Federal Civil Practice Seminar To Occur on January 16

Judge O’Connor Issues Costs And Attorney’s Fees Decision in ICON v. Travelocity

On November 18, 2013, Judge O’Conner issued an Order (available here), ruling upon issues regarding, among other things, Travelocity’s bill of costs and Travelocity’s request for attorney’s fees. Judge O’Conner found that costs were appropriate and awarded $75,524. Judge O’Conner … Continue reading

Posted in Costs, Judge O'Connor | Comments Off on Judge O’Connor Issues Costs And Attorney’s Fees Decision in ICON v. Travelocity

Judge Kinkeade Issues Injunction in Red Dog Mobile Shelters v. Rising S

On December 2, 2013, Judge Kinkeade issued a Final Judgment And Agreed Permanent Injunction (available here) in Red Dog Mobile Shelters v. Rising S. The injunction prohibits defendant from selling certain shelters during the term of the patent-in-suit.

Posted in Injunctions, Judge Kinkeade | Comments Off on Judge Kinkeade Issues Injunction in Red Dog Mobile Shelters v. Rising S

Judge O’Conner Issues Costs Decision in Summit 6 v. Samsung

On November 26, 2013, Judge O’Conner entered an Order (available here) in Summit 6 v. Samsung. The Order resolved issues regarding Summit 6’s bill of costs. Summit 6 sought $168,000 in costs; Samsung contended that costs should be taxed at … Continue reading

Posted in Costs, Judge O'Connor | Comments Off on Judge O’Conner Issues Costs Decision in Summit 6 v. Samsung

Judge Kinkeade Grants Transfer Motion in Victualic v. Romar Supply Patent Infringement Case

On November 14, 2013, Judge Kinkeade issued a transfer opinion (available here) in Victualic v. Romar Supply. Judge Kinkeade granted the defendant’s motion to transfer venue, finding that transfer was appropriate in light of the first-t0-file rule.

Posted in Judge Kinkeade | Comments Off on Judge Kinkeade Grants Transfer Motion in Victualic v. Romar Supply Patent Infringement Case