Author Archives: Steven Callahan

Varatec Hits Advanced Technology Video With Patent Infringement Lawsuit

Posted on April 28, 2014 by Steven Callahan

On April 10, 2014, Varatec filed a patent infringement lawsuit (complaint available here) against Advanced Technology Video. Varatec asserts that Advanced Technology Video infringes U.S. Patent No. 7,792,256 through the sale of its surveillance systems that allow the user to … Continue reading →

Posted in New Lawsuits Filed | Comments Off on Varatec Hits Advanced Technology Video With Patent Infringement Lawsuit

LakeSouth Sues Ace Evert for Patent Infringement

Posted on April 28, 2014 by Steven Callahan

On April 14, 2014, LakeSouth filed a lawsuit in the Northern District of Texas against Ace Evert (complaint available here). LakeSouth claims that Ace Evert infringes U.S. Patent No. 6,612,713 through the sale of patio and outdoor umbrellas.

Posted in New Lawsuits Filed | Comments Off on LakeSouth Sues Ace Evert for Patent Infringement

Flexible Innovations Sues Pristine Screens For Patent Infringement In Northern District of Texas

Posted on April 14, 2014 by Steven Callahan

On April 3, 2014, Flexible Innovations filed a lawsuit (available here) against Pristine Screens in the Northern District of Texas. Flexible Innovations asserts that Pristine Screens infringes U.S. Patent No. 7,431,983, through the sale of microfiber screen cleaning products.

Posted in New Lawsuits Filed | Comments Off on Flexible Innovations Sues Pristine Screens For Patent Infringement In Northern District of Texas

Federal Circuit Judge William Bryson Issues District Court Opinion Concerning 35 U.S.C. § 101 Challenge to Patentability

Posted on April 14, 2014 by Steven Callahan

On February 19, 2014, Federal Circuit Judge William Bryson, sitting as a district court judge in the Eastern District of Texas, issued a memorandum opinion and order (available here) denying a motion for summary judgment of invalidity premised on 35 … Continue reading →

Posted in Developing Law | Comments Off on Federal Circuit Judge William Bryson Issues District Court Opinion Concerning 35 U.S.C. § 101 Challenge to Patentability

Good Reason to Use Local Counsel

Posted on April 14, 2014 by Steven Callahan

We came across a decision from the Western District of Texas that illustrates a good reason to use local counsel. In the Order (available here), the Court denied defendants’ motion to dismiss because the pleading exceeded the local rule’s page … Continue reading →

Posted in Practice Tips | Comments Off on Good Reason to Use Local Counsel

Judge Godbey Issues Claim Construction Order In Shire v. Neos Therapeutics

Posted on April 14, 2014 by Steven Callahan

On March 20, 2014, Judge Godbey issued an Order (available here) construing various terms of the patent in suit in Shire v. Neos Therapeutics. Of particular note is Judge Godbey’s decision not to limit the scope of the patent in … Continue reading →

Posted in Judge Godbey (Chief Judge) | Comments Off on Judge Godbey Issues Claim Construction Order In Shire v. Neos Therapeutics

Judge Lynn Denies Motion to Dismiss Premised On Alleged Lack of Patent-Eligible Subject Matter, Provides Summary Judgment Schedule With “Limited and Proportional Discovery”

Posted on March 11, 2014 by Steven Callahan

On February 28, 2014, Judge Lynn issued an order (available here) in Placemark Investments v. Prudential Investments. The defendants in the case had filed motions to dismiss asserting that the patent in suit did not claim patent eligible subject matter … Continue reading →

Posted in Judge Lynn | Comments Off on Judge Lynn Denies Motion to Dismiss Premised On Alleged Lack of Patent-Eligible Subject Matter, Provides Summary Judgment Schedule With “Limited and Proportional Discovery”

Judge Godbey Disqualifies Attorneys and Firm Representing Micrografx in Samsung Case

Posted on March 11, 2014 by Steven Callahan

On March 7, 2014, Judge Godbey issued an order (available here), in Micrografx v. Samsung. Samsung had moved to disqualify several of plaintiff’s attorneys and the attorneys’ law firm due to their past representation of Samsung. The disqualified attorneys had … Continue reading →

Posted in Judge Godbey (Chief Judge) | Comments Off on Judge Godbey Disqualifies Attorneys and Firm Representing Micrografx in Samsung Case

Magistrate Judge Koenig Up for Reappointment

Posted on March 11, 2014 by Steven Callahan

The Northern District of Texas has issued a public notice (available here) regarding Magistrate Judge Koenig’s reappointment. Judge Koenig’s present term is due to expire on December 27, 2014. Her new term would be for eight years. The Clerk of … Continue reading →

Posted in Magistrate Judge Koenig (Ret.) | Comments Off on Magistrate Judge Koenig Up for Reappointment

Magistrate Judge Frost

Posted on March 11, 2014 by Steven Callahan

Magistrate Judge Frost has been a magistrate judge in the Northern District of Texas since 2011. He is a 1984 graduate of Angelo State University, and a 1987 graduate of Texas Tech University School of Law. He served as a … Continue reading →

Posted in Magistrate Judge Frost | Comments Off on Magistrate Judge Frost