Author Archives: Steven Callahan

US Supreme Court Says Patent Owners May Recover Foreign Damages In Certain Instances

On June 22, 2018, the US Supreme Court issued its opinion in WesternGeco LLC v. ION Geophysical Corp. (available here). Under 35 U. S. C. § 271(f)(2), a company can be held liable for patent infringement if it ships components … Continue reading

Posted in U.S. Supreme Court | Comments Off on US Supreme Court Says Patent Owners May Recover Foreign Damages In Certain Instances

New Patent Cases Filed In N.D. Tex.

Over the last several weeks, there have been 10 new patent cases filed in the Northern District of Texas, including: Coding Technologies, LLC v. SAS Institute, Inc. (complaint available here); CUPP Cybersecurity LLC v. Symantec Corp. (complaint available here); CUPP Cybersecurity, … Continue reading

Posted in New Lawsuits Filed | Comments Off on New Patent Cases Filed In N.D. Tex.

Federal Circuit Rules That, Under Patent Venue Statute, A Corporation Resides Only In The District Where Its Principal Place Of Business Is, Not In Every District Within The State

On May 15, 2018, the Federal Circuit issued its decision in In re BigCommerce, Inc. (available here). In the case, BigCommerce sought a writ of mandamus, challenging the Eastern District of Texas’ orders denying a motion to dismiss and transfer … Continue reading

Posted in Federal Circuit Court of Appeals | Comments Off on Federal Circuit Rules That, Under Patent Venue Statute, A Corporation Resides Only In The District Where Its Principal Place Of Business Is, Not In Every District Within The State

US Supreme Court Rules That PTAB Must Issue Decision On All Challenged Patent Claims If PTAB Institutes Review

On April 24, 2018, the US Supreme Court issued its opinion in SAS Institute Inc. v. Iancu (available here). The Court held that “[w]hen the Patent Office institutes an inter partes review, it must decide the patentability of all the … Continue reading

Posted in U.S. Supreme Court | Comments Off on US Supreme Court Rules That PTAB Must Issue Decision On All Challenged Patent Claims If PTAB Institutes Review

US Supreme Court Upholds Constitutionality of Inter Partes Reviews in Oil States

On April 24, 2018, the US Supreme Court issued its opinion in Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. Greene’s Energy Group, LLC (available here). The Court held that inter partes review is constitutional and violates neither Article III nor the … Continue reading

Posted in U.S. Supreme Court | Comments Off on US Supreme Court Upholds Constitutionality of Inter Partes Reviews in Oil States

Judge Godbey Allows Alternative Service on Foreign Defendant

On March 16, 2018, Judge Godbey entered an Order in Fundamental Innovation systems International, LLC v. ZTE Corp. (available here) resolving ZTE Corporation’s motion to dismiss for improper service. In this case, Fundamental engaged a foreign process server to serve … Continue reading

Posted in Judge Godbey (Chief Judge) | Comments Off on Judge Godbey Allows Alternative Service on Foreign Defendant

Texas Supreme Court Rules Patent Agent Emails Are Privileged

On February 23, 2018, the Texas Supreme Court issued its decision in In re Andrew Silver (available here). In this case, Silver claimed he invented the technology that became a “stand-alone tablet designed to allow customers at restaurants to order food and … Continue reading

Posted in Non-N.D. Tex. Notable Decisions | Comments Off on Texas Supreme Court Rules Patent Agent Emails Are Privileged

New Patent Cases

Over the last several weeks, 11 new patent cases have been filed in the Northern District of Texas, including: Bascom Global Internet Services, Inc. v. AT&T Corp. (complaint available here); Canon Inc. v. eReplacements, LLC (complaint available here); Cumberland Systems … Continue reading

Posted in New Lawsuits Filed | Comments Off on New Patent Cases

Magistrate Judge Ramirez Rules that Audio/Visual Costs are Not Recoverable Without Pre-Authorization

On January 30, 2018, Magistrate Judge Ramirez issued a ruling in Jean Melchior v. Hilite International, Inc. (available here). At trial, Melchior prevailed on its patent-infringement claim, but the Federal Circuit later vacated the judgment. Hilite then submitted its bill … Continue reading

Posted in Costs, Magistrate Judge Ramirez | Comments Off on Magistrate Judge Ramirez Rules that Audio/Visual Costs are Not Recoverable Without Pre-Authorization

Judge Godbey Strikes Deposition in Twitter Case: Party May Not “Moot” a Motion for a Protective Order By Unilaterally Proceeding With the Contested Conduct

On December 12, 2017, Judge Godbey entered an order (available here) in Youtoo v. Twitter striking a deposition taken by Youtoo. In the case, Youtoo noticed a deposition, and Twitter filed a motion for a protective order within the three … Continue reading

Posted in Discovery, Judge Godbey (Chief Judge) | Comments Off on Judge Godbey Strikes Deposition in Twitter Case: Party May Not “Moot” a Motion for a Protective Order By Unilaterally Proceeding With the Contested Conduct