Author Archives: Steven Callahan

Voluntary Dismissal of Lawsuit Without Prejudice Triggers 1 Year IPR Bar Date

35 U.S.C. § 315(b) provides that an inter partes review “may not be instituted if the petition requesting the proceeding is filed more than 1 year after the date on which the petitioner . . . is served with a … Continue reading

Posted in Federal Circuit Court of Appeals | Comments Off on Voluntary Dismissal of Lawsuit Without Prejudice Triggers 1 Year IPR Bar Date

Moving For Attorney’s Fees? Judge Kinkeade Lays Out A Road Map For Your Proof On Reasonableness

On May 15, 2018, Judge Kinkeade denied (without prejudice to refiling) SAP’s Motion for Recovery of Attorneys’ Fees (Order available here). In this patent case, SAP prevailed against InvestPic, and Judge Kinkeade found the case exceptional, such that SAP was … Continue reading

Posted in Attorney's Fees, Judge Kinkeade | Comments Off on Moving For Attorney’s Fees? Judge Kinkeade Lays Out A Road Map For Your Proof On Reasonableness

Federal Circuit Sees Through Purchase of Tribal Sovereign Immunity, Finds that Tribes Cannot Assert Sovereign Immunity in Inter Partes Reviews

In Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe v. Mylan (decision available here), the Federal Circuit rejected Allergen’s attempt to purchase sovereign immunity from an Indian tribe—i.e., Allergen paid millions of dollars to an Indian tribe to allow the tribe to own Allergen’s … Continue reading

Posted in Federal Circuit Court of Appeals | Comments Off on Federal Circuit Sees Through Purchase of Tribal Sovereign Immunity, Finds that Tribes Cannot Assert Sovereign Immunity in Inter Partes Reviews

Judge Scholer

Judge Scholer was appointed to the Northern District of Texas by President Trump in 2018. The Senate confirmed her 95-0. Notably, she had previously been nominated by President Obama to serve as a US District Court Judge for the Eastern … Continue reading

Posted in Judge Scholer | Comments Off on Judge Scholer

Federal Circuit Deems “Bare Bones” Complaint Sufficient Under Iqbal and Twombly

Ever since Twombly, Iqbal, and the abrogation of Form 18, patent-infringement plaintiffs have generally been filing detailed complaints showing how the defendant purportedly infringes the plaintiff’s patents. Not the plaintiff in Disc Disease Solutions v. VGH Solutions. In that case … Continue reading

Posted in Federal Circuit Court of Appeals | Comments Off on Federal Circuit Deems “Bare Bones” Complaint Sufficient Under Iqbal and Twombly

Be Careful Of What You Wish For, You Just Might Get It

Wouldn’t it be great in a products liability case if you could link your defendant to Saddam Hussein, or introduce evidence that the defendant maintains a racially hostile workplace? Not so much, says the Fifth Circuit. On April 25, 2018, … Continue reading

Posted in Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals | Comments Off on Be Careful Of What You Wish For, You Just Might Get It

Finjan v. Blue Coat Systems – Some Clues For Properly Claiming Reasonable Royalty Damages In Patent Cases

On January 10, 2018, the Federal Circuit issued its opinion in Finjan v. Blue Coat Systems (available here). A jury found Blue Coat liable for infringement of four Finjan patents, and awarded approximately $39.5 million in reasonable royalty damages. The … Continue reading

Posted in Federal Circuit Court of Appeals | Comments Off on Finjan v. Blue Coat Systems – Some Clues For Properly Claiming Reasonable Royalty Damages In Patent Cases

Judge Kinkeade Cuts Jury Award in Oculus Case By $250 Million

On June 27, 2018, Judge Kinkeade entered an Order (available here). The Order granted Defendants’ motion for judgment as a matter of law on Plaintiffs’ false designation of origin claim. The jury had awarded $250 million on this claim against … Continue reading

Posted in Judge Kinkeade | Comments Off on Judge Kinkeade Cuts Jury Award in Oculus Case By $250 Million

Federal Circuit Tosses $140 Million Jury Award In View of Entire Market Value Rule

On July 3, 2018, the Federal Circuit issued its opinion in Power Integrations v. Fairchild Semiconductor (available here). The jury had awarded approximately $140 million, finding that the entire market value rule applied in calculating damages. The Federal Circuit reversed, … Continue reading

Posted in Federal Circuit Court of Appeals | Comments Off on Federal Circuit Tosses $140 Million Jury Award In View of Entire Market Value Rule

Federal Circuit Slaps Down Yet Another Patent Damages Award in Exergen v. Briggs & Stratton

On January 12, 2018, the Federal Circuit issued its decision in Exmark Manufacturing v. Briggs & Stratton Power Products (available here). In the case, the jury awarded over $24 million in compensatory damages, which the district court doubled as enhanced … Continue reading

Posted in Federal Circuit Court of Appeals | Comments Off on Federal Circuit Slaps Down Yet Another Patent Damages Award in Exergen v. Briggs & Stratton