Judge McBryde Precludes Expert Testimony In Invue v. Hangzhou

Judge McBryde issued an Order (available here) in Invue v. Hangzhou. The Court concluded that, with respect to an expert whose report “provides virtually none of the information required by Rule 26(a)(2)(B)(i),” such expert would not be permitted to serve as an expert witness. With respect to a second expert, the Court concluded that his testimony “will be strictly limited to the contents of his initial report” plus plaintiff’s infringement charts.

This entry was posted in Judge McBryde (Ret.). Bookmark the permalink.